---
name: tbt-technical-update-three-readers
description: "Change emphasis and requested decision while preserving status and qualification for Rewrite one technical update for three workplace readers. Use permitted source material; this kit does not authorise external actions."
---

# Rewrite one technical update for three workplace readers

Change emphasis and requested decision while preserving status and qualification.

Use the supplied source as authority. Check the account supports the actual file or image operation before attempting it.

## Task instruction

Rewrite this supplied technical update for three readers:
[reader A and actual question], [reader B and question], [reader C and question].
Preserve every status, qualification, conditional date and evidence limit.
Change emphasis and explanation only. Link each important claim to its
source ID. Keep missing cost, approval or test facts as Not supplied.
Do not turn staging deployment into production release, a proposal into
a commitment or a limited check into full validation. Give short drafts
and a list of facts that must remain identical across all three.

## Source boundaries

- Staging checked 2 October
- 20-row sample reported
- 15 October proposed subject to approval

## Review and correction

The audience changes emphasis, not status or certainty. Keep pending approval visible in every version.

The [reader] draft says [overstated claim]. Source [ID] says [exact
bounded fact]. Restore that qualification and keep the useful reader
emphasis. Check the same claim in the other versions. Do not add an
unsupported cost, cause or delivery promise to make the update complete.
Return the corrected drafts with their source references.

Use references/practice-source.json for the labelled example. The practice HTML is a local teaching tool; it does not call an AI service. Apply this method to the user's supplied facts rather than copying fictional example values. Do not infer approval or permission to publish.