Rewrite this supplied technical update for three readers:
[reader A and actual question], [reader B and question], [reader C and question].
Preserve every status, qualification, conditional date and evidence limit.
Change emphasis and explanation only. Link each important claim to its
source ID. Keep missing cost, approval or test facts as Not supplied.
Do not turn staging deployment into production release, a proposal into
a commitment or a limited check into full validation. Give short drafts
and a list of facts that must remain identical across all three.

---

For each draft, map status/date/check claims to the supplied source.
List any qualification omitted during compression. Explain whether
that omission changes the meaning. Do not use the polished draft as
its own evidence, and do not infer approval or completed testing.

---

The [reader] draft says [overstated claim]. Source [ID] says [exact
bounded fact]. Restore that qualification and keep the useful reader
emphasis. Check the same claim in the other versions. Do not add an
unsupported cost, cause or delivery promise to make the update complete.
Return the corrected drafts with their source references.
