---
name: tbt-supplier-price-unit-comparison
description: "Normalise only agreed units and retain billing, quantities and missing fees for Compare supplier prices with different units and commitments. Use permitted source material; this kit does not authorise external actions."
---

# Compare supplier prices with different units and commitments

Normalise only agreed units and retain billing, quantities and missing fees.

Use the supplied source as authority. Check the account supports the actual file or image operation before attempting it.

## Task instruction

Compare these supplied quotes for [quantity/users] over [period].
Preserve each price unit, billing cadence, minimum paid quantity,
commitment, setup fee, currency and tax/exclusion wording.
Show the normalisation steps, billed quantity and known components.
Keep a missing fee as unknown and a total requiring it incomplete.
Do not rank complete costs when a required component is missing.
Ask focused questions for incompatible units or an unagreed scope.
Provide the source-linked table and actual calculation file if supported.

## Source boundaries

- A: £18/user/month, min 10, £200 setup
- B: £240/10-seat pack/year, min 2 packs
- B setup unavailable

## Review and correction

Annual packs and monthly seats need explicit normalisation. B's known subscription is not a complete first-year total.

The comparison treats [missing fee / wrong unit / rounded-down pack]
as [incorrect value]. Source [ID] supplies [actual unit/status].
Correct the billed quantity and affected totals, keeping the agreed
scope and original quote wording. Leave required unknowns incomplete.
Do not invent a fee or a cheaper-option conclusion to finish the table.

Use references/practice-source.json for the labelled example. The practice HTML is a local teaching tool; it does not call an AI service. Apply this method to the user's supplied facts rather than copying fictional example values. Do not infer approval or permission to publish.