Draft an editable process diagram from these supplied rules only.
Give each node and decision branch a source rule ID. Preserve exact
thresholds, exceptions, rejection and return paths. Keep missing rules
as explicit questions. Provide a plain-language path list beside the
diagram. Do not add policy, infer authority or claim the workflow is
implemented. Return an editable file or source, plus a readable preview.

---

List the diagram path for [ordinary case], [boundary case] and
[exception]. For each decision, state the supplied rule ID and exact
condition. Identify a missing or ambiguous rule instead of assuming
it. Do not use the diagram itself as evidence that a policy exists.

---

The draft branch [ID] uses [wrong condition] instead of the supplied
rule [ID: exact condition]. Correct that branch and affected path list.
Restore [missing rejection/return route] from its source. Keep node
labels editable and unresolved questions visible. Do not redesign
the whole process or introduce a new approval rule to tidy the layout.
